Is resilience engineering realist or constructivist ? - Ineris - Institut national de l'environnement industriel et des risques Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2008

Is resilience engineering realist or constructivist ?

Résumé

This exploratory paper questions whether resilience engineering is a realist or constructivist approach of safety. After a presentation of two positions: critical realism and radical constructivism, the authors explain how the frameworks provided by these two positions were used in different researches, answering different questions that arose during the work. For one, critical realism offered an answer to the problem of the relationship between agency and structure. For the other, radical constructivism afforded a good definition of what models can be thought as. Both developments show the relevance of taking into account of philosophical antecedents for applied research and how this is valuable for resilience engineering and the directions that could be pursued for future development.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
2008-298_hal.pdf (800.4 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

ineris-00976208 , version 1 (09-04-2014)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : ineris-00976208 , version 1

Citer

Jean-Christophe Le Coze, Kenneth Pettersen. Is resilience engineering realist or constructivist ?. 3. Resilience Engineering Symposium, Oct 2008, Antibes - Juan-les-Pins, France. pp.175-184. ⟨ineris-00976208⟩

Collections

INERIS
163 Consultations
481 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More